Tuesday, July 30, 2013

"Just don't title your blog post that!"

Sage words of wisdom from the manfriend, since "Yeah, we're swingers" would surely attract an audience that would be nothing but disappointed by the results of their google search.  And I don't mind disappointing people - hell, that's practically my job description - but maybe it's just unwise...given the content of my blog as a whole.

So yeah. We're swingers. As in: can't walk past a swing set at the park without hoping on for a ride.  Now, I would never hog a seat if kids were waiting, but (as was the case on this scrapped about evening) if the seats are largely empty, hells yeah, I can't resist.

This was from Memorial Day weekend.  We had eaten dinner at iHop and decided to try to walk off some of the calories.  It was a gorgeous evening, a light breeze, mid-60s...perfect walking weather.  We both had our cameras with us and when we saw the empty bank of swings I immediately thought of doing a "panning" self portrait.  Panning is a photographic technique where the photographer moves the camera while the shutter is open.  Normally moving a camera while the shutter is open would give you a blurry picture, but with panning, you move the camera smoothly and at the same rate of speed that the subject is moving.  You see panning a lot with race cars - the end result gives you a car that is tack sharp but everything that isn't moving is blurred.  It might be easy to confuse a panned shot with a shallow depth of field, since they have similar looks.  But with a panning shot the roadway under the moving car would be blurred, whereas in a shallow depth of field shot the road would still be sharp.

So my idea was that if we were swinging, we could take self portraits of ourselves using this technique.  Problem is, you need to be able to have a little control over your shutter speed to make this work.  And it requires that you hold the camera as steady as possible within the constraints it actually moving.  So in the race car scenario, your arms are braced at your sides and you swivel at the waist.  In the swing scenario you have to hold the camera out in front of you for the selfie, but it's hard to hold it perfectly steady while you're moving on the swing.  So, my shots didn't pan because my little Nikon S01 has no overrides.  Kerig had the manual overrides, but couldn't get the camera to be absolutely steady - although he had way better luck than I did.

But it almost doesn't matter if the shots worked.  We were cracking up the whole time.  First, trying to swing high with only one hand on the chain? Yeah, sort of fun/scary, but it definitely gives you a little rush.  But also, we'd take a shot and look at what we got and they were funny. And by 'funny' I mean god-awful and terribly unflattering.  Kerig got a good one of him, but sadly I'm in the background looking less than, um, 'with it.'  The bottom line is: we had a lot fun.


This is the best shot of the two of us.  Yes, I realize we're not really interacting.  And I'm not even trying the technique.  But I'm looking at my results, so that counts. ;)

Yes. The sewing on this is a little rough.  We (the sewing machine and I) were having a slight difference of opinion.  It appears the machine won that argument.  C'st la vie.

Also: the washi tape at the top as We R Memory Keepers and it's billed as navy.
Dear We R Memory Keepers: I don't know what you're smoking, but that is NOT navy.

And guess who's finally carrying his own weight around here??  Just kidding.  But Kerig has a degree in photography and LOTS of yummy equipment.  Including a copy stand:


A copy stand was how we recreated artwork (or text) back in the old days before scanners.  It holds the camera perfectly parallel to base so that the image is nice and square instead of all wonky and trapezoidal.  Since taking these pictures is a royal pain in the ass, handing off the picture taking part is really wonderful.

This could be the start of something beautiful.


3 comments:

  1. The photo is just perfect for the story. I love the expression on his face and it captures that you are checking your camera.

    The title of the blog made me do a double-take. I just could not help it. Ms. "I am going to a Catholic college to get a teaching degree to make more of a difference in the world" finally gets to settle in with her Mr. He has to leave for two weeks and she can't wait for him to get home .... and the following week, it's "Yeah, we're SWINGERS!" Wow. :0P

    From last week: The Mr.'s new glasses look great on him. I can't comprehend not having a photo taken with glasses on as I have been wearing them since I was six. On the other hand, I am rarely in a shot .... (I am going to fix that).

    I am not at all interested in the stamping portion of the Cameo. It sounded intriguing but now that I see what it is, I have no use for it. I am not into stamping that much and for those that are, most would have those supplies already.

    Happy Wednesday!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's actually wearing my glasses in that shot. He was making fun of me and needed to put them on to get the impersonation just right. He tried to see what he looked like with them on, but my Rx is pretty hideous, so I took a picture of him.

      I don't see myself using the stamping aspect of the Silhouette either. I'm not much of a stamper to start with, but even if I were....it seems like a whole lotta work!

      BTW, in real life, I enjoy my 17 year old boy humor, but mostly I'm a goody two shoes. Who likes to swing. On swings. At the park. :P

      Delete
  2. I am the same .... mostly a goody two shoes. :)

    The Mr. looked great in your glasses. They fit his face well. :)

    Am happy that you are happy.

    ReplyDelete